Monday, March 28, 2011

What brand of PURE 100% dark chocolate can I buy at a health food store

What brand of PURE 100% dark chocolate can I buy at a health food store?
That has like no sugar and is healthy and good for u and ur skin. thx. :)
Vegetarian & Vegan - 6 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
Well, finding one with out sugar would be pretty hard to find. You could try searching online... I know they make this dark chocolate called Endangered Species, but they're sugar is organic and they donate to endangered species. Doubt that answered your question though...
2 :
basically what you are talking about is bakers Chocolate. just coco and oil
3 :
No sugar? Good luck lol. But, the one chocolate bar that I buy when i'm having a craving is Green and black's 70-85% coco, dark chocolate. It's organic and really rich and yummy. (not to mention it's 100% vegan) (:.
4 :
There's organic dark chocolate that is at walgreens now. It's called Endangered Species Chocolate. The mint forest kind is vegan and sweetened with water filtered beet sugar.
5 :
Eww, 100% dark chocolate? I imagine that would be extremely bitter!
6 :
go to http://healthmad.com/nutrition/chocolate-the-key-to-better-health

Thursday, March 24, 2011

Would cannibals consider chowing down on a Vegan to be eating health food

Would cannibals consider chowing down on a Vegan to be eating health food?

Polls & Surveys - 10 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
Why would you ask something like that.? lol
2 :
No they wouldn't...
3 :
sure do, pass the salt please
4 :
i dont think so..
5 :
That Makes 'Sense' To Me,.....lol...!!
6 :
Nope.They just need a little fiber every now and then.Those free range corn feed missionaries,stick to your ribs a little too well.
7 :
I don't think so !
8 :
I was told they are too stringy. They like high protein and lots of it. The Mac diet keeps them regular.
9 :
yes cause i've heard that people that eat really healthy have the best tasting ones.
10 :
haha, yeah i would say so

Read more discussions :

Sunday, March 20, 2011

Did you know that illegal immigrants without health insurance prepare food in restaurants where YOU ea

Did you know that illegal immigrants without health insurance prepare food in restaurants where YOU eat?
Wouldn't it better to give them health insurance? Or you prefer to catch a disease from eating in your favorite restaurant?
Immigration - 18 Answers

Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
No, it would be better if they went home...NOW.
2 :
Actually, I would prefer that they go.
3 :
Do you know we don't care, no amnesty for illegals, they can go home and apply to come legally if they enjoy cooking so much!
4 :
Good point! More reason to deport them!
5 :
many american citizen work without insurance...what's the point??
6 :
No, it would be better to deport them.
7 :
My favorite restaurant opperates legally. And FYI anyone can buy heath insurance so what's you're point?
8 :
No, it would not be better to provide them with free health care.. it would be better to send them home. They are illegal!! Barring that.. send them all to work in the White house.. and prepare Bush's food. Now that is a great idea!
9 :
The best and, ultimately, most charitable thing we can do as a people and as a government is to send'm home with handbooks on hygiene and healthcare as well as info on establishing better governments in their OWN countries. See the YouTube video linked below. The paltry few people we could help by opening the floodgates into the U.S. for "a better life" would be plenty to wreck the very economic stability they're coming for, yet never so much as scratch the surface of ending poverty. see how my question relates to this at: http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20070917162949AAEK2vn&r=w
10 :
I would prefer for illegals not to be here at all! US citizens must wake up to this unfolding, American tragedy. Take a look at this. (Thanks to the original poster, whose name I've forgotten.) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n7WJeqxuOfQ
11 :
let bush employ them as secret service. he should have to deal with the translation issues.
12 :
yes i do know this...becuase i went to the kitchen and sit on the floor enjoing the dinner brought by my server. and all of them i talk to don't speak english but love having a customer like me...since i go to kitchen and eat the food with them...of course...a little spit here and there...
13 :
I cook my own food. Healthier and cheaper
14 :
Free health insurance would not ensure good personal hygiene. Or prevent deliberate contamination. Not just picking on illegals here either. You wouldn't want to know some of the things I've seen working in restaurants. And what about uninsured citizens? They are sometimes allowed to work in restaurants too these days.
15 :
Did you know that the United States should worry more about checking the food imported from China? Which do you think is the bigger problem--- the illegal immigrants who work in restraurants or the under-inspected food imported from China? But, no I don't believe in giving them Health insurance--- people have to pay for their own insurance.
16 :
Why in the HELL would we "give" health insurance to illegal alien criminals when we don't "give" it to legal American citizens and immigrants?? Do you realize how many MILLIONS of Americans have NO health insurance?? Yeah, that's right, give me a fucking thumbs down. You had no response, so you think a thumbs down "proves something"? What I stated is 100% FACT, can't handle it??
17 :
I prefer to not employ them at ALL! Send the lawbreakers back home! Do you know there are some AMERICANS without health insurance? If they want to be Americans they should go about it LEGALLY! The LAST FREE thing an illegal lawbreaker should get from the American taxpayer is a free ride back HOME via military escort! They should demand health insurance in their own country!
18 :
Yes,I was fully aware of this.Are you aware that most Americans,BORN here in the USA do not have any health insurance? Here we are one of the superpowers of the world,and no universal healthcare for our own citizens

Read more discussions :

Wednesday, March 16, 2011

Can you buy Atkins shakes anywhere that sells food products or do you have to go to a health food store

Can you buy Atkins shakes anywhere that sells food products or do you have to go to a health food store?

Diet & Fitness - 4 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
I know of shakes that are much better for weight loss:).....My family and I have been using the best cleansing technology...:)the first time I did it, I lost 16 pounds in 9 days:)...check out this site....w w w .gocleanse. com/colin It will change your life:)
2 :
You can find them most anywhere, places such as wal-mart, target, etc, as well as health stores and vitamin stores.
3 :
I have found them at hyvee, price chopper, and wallgreens pharmacy in Independence MO. You can also use slim fast low carb shakes too

Read more discussions :

Saturday, March 12, 2011

How many billions a year could we save if he did not educate and provide health care & food stamps to illegals

How many billions a year could we save if he did not educate and provide health care & food stamps to illegals?
Why don't we stop doing that?
Politics - 2 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
More than you can possibly imagine.
2 :
We could provide free college educations to all US citizens with the money we saved. We should do that instead. That'll never happen though. Poor people wouldn't have to join the military to have hope of decent futures if we did

Tuesday, March 8, 2011

Why did consumers really wanted-fair wages or health food in the 1965

Why did consumers really wanted-fair wages or health food in the 1965?

History - 3 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
I am not sure that the term "health food" even existed in 1965. True I would have been around 9 back then, but really, food and also consumer products were much simpler back then. You could buy vitamins and herbs and stuff though. But health food, if the term existed, would have been more of a fad. Oh, healthier food, or more natural food were in the vocabulary, even back then. You would have to find some old books on health from that era to back ant theory. As for wages, well lower income wage earners have been struggling for fairness and parity since the end of WWII. In fact, if you read any decen Kennedy Biography, you will find that ine of JFK's campain promises was "a war on poverty". In fact, his VP Lyndon Johnson, wanted to build "The Great Society". Alas, all we got was the Vietnam War, which cost billions, and derailled all the anti-poverty programs.
2 :
There was little manufactured food in 1965, meat contained no preservative, health food as a term did not exist, but food generally was better to eat than some of it is now. I don't think the term consumers was coined then either. Low income earners have always wanted fair wages, even now if you were offered a fair wage of a bottle of vitamin pills what would you choose?
3 :
Our food was filled with things we didn't know about, and few of us knew the food was not healthy. The first famous "kook" (as we believed him to be) was the man who said cold breakfast cereal had no nutrition. That was when they began to add vitamins and minerals, and to put labels on the packages, of their contents. But it was not a big deal until the late 70's/early 80's when we knew much more, and the children born in the 60's demanded healthy food. "Health food" is still considered "kook" food by some people, yet those same people do not consider "healthy" food to be "kooky." Manufactured food has been "fixed" enough for the greatest majority of people, who can now see the list of ingredients, the exact calorie counts, the nutrition, and to make their own decisions. Fair wages were not hard to get, as far as I remember. We were a fast growing economy, we were trying to beat the Russians at every turn, and the Japanese had not yet invaded our markets with their superior, smaller, lightweight radios and other goods. So we were paid as good as we expected to get. My father got union carpenter wages, and good benefits, doctor and dental insurance, we had new clothes, shoes, lots of food, but most parents slaved to save what they did not spend. "Buying power" would not come until the 70's, with lower prices on "consumer goods" (we didn't even use that term in the '65) so "conspicuous consuption" had not been invented yet. But we didn't feel poor. Back to the food. We didn't feel underfed or ill-fed, either. We really did think the "healthy food" people were kooks, just like people hated Ralph Nader for being a "know-it-all" and a "do-gooder," in the auto industry for safety--not to mention he was hated to taking a classic car off the road. It is because of Nader directly that the Congress has so much contol over the car industry, the oil industry, insurance, and anything else they can get their hands on. In '65 the price of a new family sized car could be as low as $1500. We hated it just as much when Congress began messing with manufactured food. So, we had our wages; and we didn't want "health" forced on us, any more than we want it forced on us now

Read more discussions :

Friday, March 4, 2011

Why do socialist want everyone to have all the guarantee, health care food and shelter

Why do socialist want everyone to have all the guarantee, health care food and shelter?
The things we gurantee prisoners, I want a lot more I don't want to work while the lazies don't but have everything I have because I work. We have those who do and those who don't, do you want to be the one to do for those who don't? All good American answers except of course the douche bag , but I think he's jut trying to live up to his miserable reputation. It's going to be tough.
Politics - 10 Answers

Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
horrible trolling; not even close edit- I take that back; wow, everyday I come on here the Libertardians seem to be stupider, welcome to the family!
2 :
Losers seek equality, winners seek independence.
3 :
Socialists would want guaranteed call girls if we let them get away with it.
4 :
The number of socialists in America is very small as most Americans don't want these things "guaranteed", but only more accessible to the vast majority of citizens.
5 :
Their losers, following what they believe to be the easiest road.
6 :
BECAUSE THEY BELIEVE IN SOCIAL JUSTICE AND NOT IN INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS
7 :
Because everyone should be able to live
8 :
Because they're too lazy to go out and provide for themselves. They'd rather sit back and blame rich people, republicans, Bush, etc. rather than get up and do something for themselves.
9 :
they want everyone to think, do, be as of one mind. Easier to control that way.
10 :
These are some of the basics of life. It's not a socialist or a communist thing. It's usually a sign of a civilized society when the basics are provided to those who can't provide them for themselves: children, the elderly, the infirm (sick or handicapped). Everyone else should have paid in (unemployment insurance, SSI, etc.) to receive them or have to work off their costs if they get them. Few of us want the U.S. to look like India where the poorest of the poor, the rag pickers, spend their miserable days crawling over heaps of steaming, stinking garbage. There's an ethical and moral problem with forced labor in the U.S. There's also a problem with liability. Since the U.S. has far too many lawyers and lawsuits it's too easy for someone doing mandated work in exchange for benefits to injure themselves and then file suit against the government (i.e. us). Working is not a choice. People are raised to have a work ethic. You work because there's something inside you that makes you want to work. Some people just aren't raised right. I have a nephew who's always been a well-cared for "boy" and, at 31 years old, he's still a boy who can't stay out of trouble, can't get a job and can't take care of himself without the help of family and government. I love him because he's family. I won't give him a nickel and hate that he's chosen to live off the work of others. I was raised to believe that you make your bed and then you lay in it. When I taught I always had a sign in the front of my classroom that said "Your failure to plan is not my emergency". I don't mind helping those that need it but it's difficult helping those who won't help themselves

Read more discussions :

Tuesday, March 1, 2011

Is Vitex availiable at health food stores or do I need to order it online?

Trying to Conceive - 3 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
Yes, it's available at health food stores, at least it is where I live.
2 :
It's available at most large drug stores (Walgreens, CVS) and at supplement stores like GNC and Vitamin World. It should be labeled Vitex but another word for this supplement is Chaste Tree Berry. If you can't find it, you can ask an associate and they should know where it is.
3 :
Sure you can find it at some health food or vitamin shops. You'll most likely pay around $6 a bottle, which isnt bad considering that Ovulex and Fertilaid is around $40 a bottle and does basically the same thing as Vitex + Prenatal Vitamins I got my Vitex from Vitamins.com and paid about $2 a bottle. I started taking them on Oct 3rd and my AF came on Oct 20th so I know its working for me already! Anyway, I really LOVE Vitamins.com, they have a lot of really good stuff for super cheap. I believe they even accept money orders, so you wont have to worry about a credit card or anything. Also, their shipping is super fast! Look at me, I sound like a commercial lmao Good luck! baby dust~*~*~*~*

Read more discussions :